Peer Review in Science

Has your scientific manuscript been rejected by a journal? Has your research proposal been rejected by a funding agency? Most professional scientist know the pain of rejection by unfair peer review. One would expect scientific peer review to be fair, objective, and efficient. After all, scientists are people who live by the scientific method – the most successful approach to the natural world that humankind has developed. Yet, practical scientific peer review is often flawed. Here is a book that analyzes the problems of scientific peer review from a broader point of view, considering insights from evolutionary biology, evolutionary psychology, and complexity. Written by a professional scientist for other scientists, the book addresses the daily need to undersdtand and deal with the limitations of scientific peer review.

• Homepage
• Brief
  Description
• Abstract

• Scientific
  Peer Review
• Rejection
• Psychology
• Darwinism
• Complexity
• Degenerate
  Repertoires

• Testimonials
• Press Release
• About
  the Author

• Amazon
• Google
• BioBitField

• E-mail
• Write to